Robert McGregor
11-25-2003, 07:19 AM
"Kai" <soberon@nospamo.luukku.com> wrote in message
news:bpvdg1$oll$1@phys-news1.kolumbus.fi...
> Robert McGregor wrote:
>
> > "Kai" <soberon@nospamo.luukku.com> wrote in message
> > news:bpva8u$kd4$1@phys-news1.kolumbus.fi...
> >
> > Given AA's specific exhortation to rigorous honesty, with your repeated,
> > pointed, sarcastic references to rigorous honesty, it seems obvious you
have
> > some sort of a problem with honesty.
>
> Indeed. I do have 'a problem' with some specific types of 'rigorous
> honesty'. For example the kind that enables a person to 'wonder'
> whether someone is 'an apparent pedophile' right here in the world
> wide NG, and then pathetically attempt to wiggle away by whining how
> it is not 'suspecting', but mere 'wondering', as if anything written
> into a post here is just 'wondering'. That's how weasels define
> honesty. Are you a weasel, Bob?
Not at all, but it seems on this topic you are,.
> >>
> >>"I wondered if you could really be boytoboy, the apparent
> >>paedophile who posted here before rosie arrived with her dildo; and
> >>polarising acrimony."
> >>
> >>Wiggle away, but right there you suspect me of being 'an apparent
> >>paedophile' with absolutely nothing to justify such accusations. Or
> >>maybe you think to not disapprove of gays I must myself be one, and
> >>everybody knows gays are pedophiles, eh? Is that it?
> >
> > Wondering is a long long way from suspecting. Suspecting is not
accusing.
>
> Okay. Part of your 'rigorous honesty' includes twisting words to not
> have to stand up for insults you have made.
I am not purporting to "rigorous" honesty here, that term is pertinent to
self honesty, as anyone familiar with the AA program of recovery would
surely know. I do purport to a degree of honesty here though, thus the
words I used still stand, regardless of how *you* try to twist them..
>
> >
> > Your *false* allegations of bigots and homophobes, on the "evidence" of
one
> > word, certainly leads me to suspect you could indeed be an active or
latent
> > homosexual, expressing your heterophobia.
>
> And if it were so, that would be pertinent to just which particular
> issue, or even a matter of interest to you, in what way?
Jeez, given you can't even cope with suspicions, I'm certainly free to
reject your false allegations..
>
> As for my 'false' allegations, I'm certain I'm not the only one who's
> seen it. Several others have mentioned they do not approve of the
> 'abuse' Jonathan has received here.
>
> Kai
>
Should be obvious to even you by now, it doesn't matter a flying fuck to me
what others approve of. Disproval by others does not prove your false
allegations.
Your poverty of reason in this thread can hardly be attributed to English
not being your native language..
By,
Bob
news:bpvdg1$oll$1@phys-news1.kolumbus.fi...
> Robert McGregor wrote:
>
> > "Kai" <soberon@nospamo.luukku.com> wrote in message
> > news:bpva8u$kd4$1@phys-news1.kolumbus.fi...
> >
> > Given AA's specific exhortation to rigorous honesty, with your repeated,
> > pointed, sarcastic references to rigorous honesty, it seems obvious you
have
> > some sort of a problem with honesty.
>
> Indeed. I do have 'a problem' with some specific types of 'rigorous
> honesty'. For example the kind that enables a person to 'wonder'
> whether someone is 'an apparent pedophile' right here in the world
> wide NG, and then pathetically attempt to wiggle away by whining how
> it is not 'suspecting', but mere 'wondering', as if anything written
> into a post here is just 'wondering'. That's how weasels define
> honesty. Are you a weasel, Bob?
Not at all, but it seems on this topic you are,.
> >>
> >>"I wondered if you could really be boytoboy, the apparent
> >>paedophile who posted here before rosie arrived with her dildo; and
> >>polarising acrimony."
> >>
> >>Wiggle away, but right there you suspect me of being 'an apparent
> >>paedophile' with absolutely nothing to justify such accusations. Or
> >>maybe you think to not disapprove of gays I must myself be one, and
> >>everybody knows gays are pedophiles, eh? Is that it?
> >
> > Wondering is a long long way from suspecting. Suspecting is not
accusing.
>
> Okay. Part of your 'rigorous honesty' includes twisting words to not
> have to stand up for insults you have made.
I am not purporting to "rigorous" honesty here, that term is pertinent to
self honesty, as anyone familiar with the AA program of recovery would
surely know. I do purport to a degree of honesty here though, thus the
words I used still stand, regardless of how *you* try to twist them..
>
> >
> > Your *false* allegations of bigots and homophobes, on the "evidence" of
one
> > word, certainly leads me to suspect you could indeed be an active or
latent
> > homosexual, expressing your heterophobia.
>
> And if it were so, that would be pertinent to just which particular
> issue, or even a matter of interest to you, in what way?
Jeez, given you can't even cope with suspicions, I'm certainly free to
reject your false allegations..
>
> As for my 'false' allegations, I'm certain I'm not the only one who's
> seen it. Several others have mentioned they do not approve of the
> 'abuse' Jonathan has received here.
>
> Kai
>
Should be obvious to even you by now, it doesn't matter a flying fuck to me
what others approve of. Disproval by others does not prove your false
allegations.
Your poverty of reason in this thread can hardly be attributed to English
not being your native language..
By,
Bob