7-21-04

[rosie read and post]

As Bill Sees It

The Fellowship's Future, p.207

"It seems proved that A.A. can stand on its own feet anywhere and
under any conditions. It has outgrown any dependence it might once
have had upon the personalities or efforts of a few of the older
members like me. New, able, and vigorous people keep coming to the
surface, turning up where they are needed. Besides, A.A. has reached
enough spiritual maturity to know that its final dependence is upon
God (HP)."

[G-A]

On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:20:52 GMT, "rosie read and post"
<readandpost@yahooORhotmail.com> wrote:

>
>As Bill Sees It
>
>The Fellowship's Future, p.207
>
>"It seems proved that A.A. can stand on its own feet anywhere and
>under any conditions.

Isn't this a grammatical error? Shouldn't it be "it seems
proven"? I don't know English enough to be able to answer for
sure. I am just wondering if there is a chance that this
Bill guy did not know English too.

G-A

[Grace]

> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:20:52 GMT, "rosie read and post"
> <readandpost@yahooORhotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> As Bill Sees It
>>
>> The Fellowship's Future, p.207
>>
>> "It seems proved that A.A. can stand on its own feet anywhere and
>> under any conditions.
>
> Isn't this a grammatical error? Shouldn't it be "it seems
> proven"? I don't know English enough to be able to answer for
> sure. I am just wondering if there is a chance that this
> Bill guy did not know English too.
>
> G-A
>

Probably not. He was 'Mercun, after all.

[Craig S.]

"G-A" <ga@net> wrote in message
news:hhvsf0570h5ul2k2obi22ec5p4f7bab3rj@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:20:52 GMT, "rosie read and post"
> <readandpost@yahooORhotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >As Bill Sees It
> >
> >The Fellowship's Future, p.207
> >
> >"It seems proved that A.A. can stand on its own feet anywhere and
> >under any conditions.
>
> Isn't this a grammatical error? Shouldn't it be "it seems
> proven"? I don't know English enough to be able to answer for
> sure. I am just wondering if there is a chance that this
> Bill guy did not know English too.

Isn't this a grammatical error? Shouldn't it be "know English, either"?

[Bobby L.]

"G-A" <ga@net> wrote in message
news:hhvsf0570h5ul2k2obi22ec5p4f7bab3rj@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:20:52 GMT, "rosie read and post"
> <readandpost@yahooORhotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >As Bill Sees It
> >
> >The Fellowship's Future, p.207
> >
> >"It seems proved that A.A. can stand on its own feet anywhere and
> >under any conditions.
>
> Isn't this a grammatical error? Shouldn't it be "it seems
> proven"? I don't know English enough to be able to answer for
> sure. I am just wondering if there is a chance that this
> Bill guy did not know English too.
>
> G-A
>

Perhaps you're looking for alt.grammar

[Dr Scott]

In article <MQBLc.14007$Yw3.8106@bignews3.bellsouth.net>,
BobbyL2000spamno@bellsouth.net says...
>
> "G-A" <ga@net> wrote in message
> news:hhvsf0570h5ul2k2obi22ec5p4f7bab3rj@4ax.com...
> > On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:20:52 GMT, "rosie read and post"
> > <readandpost@yahooORhotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >As Bill Sees It
> > >
> > >The Fellowship's Future, p.207
> > >
> > >"It seems proved that A.A. can stand on its own feet anywhere and
> > >under any conditions.
> >
> > Isn't this a grammatical error? Shouldn't it be "it seems
> > proven"? I don't know English enough to be able to answer for
> > sure. I am just wondering if there is a chance that this
> > Bill guy did not know English too.
> >
> > G-A
> >
>
> Perhaps you're looking for alt.grammar
>
Nice grammar lame!

--
Step right up!

[G-A]

On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 14:38:54 -0400, "Craig S."
<cspurlocktakethisout@takethisoutmtneer.net> wrote:

>
>"G-A" <ga@net> wrote in message
>news:hhvsf0570h5ul2k2obi22ec5p4f7bab3rj@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:20:52 GMT, "rosie read and post"
>> <readandpost@yahooORhotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >As Bill Sees It
>> >
>> >The Fellowship's Future, p.207
>> >
>> >"It seems proved that A.A. can stand on its own feet anywhere and
>> >under any conditions.
>>
>> Isn't this a grammatical error? Shouldn't it be "it seems
>> proven"? I don't know English enough to be able to answer for
>> sure. I am just wondering if there is a chance that this
>> Bill guy did not know English too.
>
>Isn't this a grammatical error? Shouldn't it be "know English, either"?

It probably should but again I can't be sure. Now, do you
know the answer to the simple question that I asked?

G-A

[David M]

G-A wrote:
> Craig S. wrote:
>> "G-A" wrote:
>>> rosie read and post wrote:

>>>> "It seems proved that A.A. can stand on its own feet
>>>> anywhere and under any conditions.

>>> Isn't this a grammatical error? Shouldn't it be "it seems
>>> proven"? I don't know English enough to be able to answer
>>> for sure. I am just wondering if there is a chance that this
>>> Bill guy did not know English too.

>> Isn't this a grammatical error? Shouldn't it be "know
>> English, either"?

> It probably should but again I can't be sure. Now, do you
> know the answer to the simple question that I asked?

You and Bill are both right. Isn't it great when that happens?

http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~brians/errors/proved.html

[G-A]

On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:43:01 -0500, "David M" <dhmce@insightbb.com> wrote:

>You and Bill are both right. Isn't it great when that happens?
>
>http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~brians/errors/proved.html

Thanks. Interesting! Many other sources say the same,
it turns out.

G-A

[rosie read and post]

what a great source..............thanks david!

--
http://www.plur.net/thisland.html






"David M" <dhmce@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:2m8k8tFjutm6U1@uni-berlin.de...
: G-A wrote:
: > Craig S. wrote:
: >> "G-A" wrote:
: >>> rosie read and post wrote:
:
: >>>> "It seems proved that A.A. can stand on its own feet
: >>>> anywhere and under any conditions.
:
: >>> Isn't this a grammatical error? Shouldn't it be "it seems
: >>> proven"? I don't know English enough to be able to answer
: >>> for sure. I am just wondering if there is a chance that this
: >>> Bill guy did not know English too.
:
: >> Isn't this a grammatical error? Shouldn't it be "know
: >> English, either"?
:
: > It probably should but again I can't be sure. Now, do you
: > know the answer to the simple question that I asked?
:
: You and Bill are both right. Isn't it great when that happens?
:
: http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~brians/errors/proved.html
:
:
:

[Kirk S.]

I thought you left this group of "sicko's"...

Kirk S.

Take what you want and leave the rest...
"G-A" <ga@net> wrote in message
news:ncbuf09fpos94ntsjbnjuforqnkl5ueiof@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:43:01 -0500, "David M" <dhmce@insightbb.com> wrote:
>
> >You and Bill are both right. Isn't it great when that happens?
> >
> >http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~brians/errors/proved.html
>
> Thanks. Interesting! Many other sources say the same,
> it turns out.
>
> G-A
>

[G-A]

On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 14:55:53 GMT, "Kirk S." <crayzkirk@yahoo.com> wrote:

>I thought you left this group of "sicko's"...
>
>Kirk S.
>
>Take what you want and leave the rest...

Fortunately, not all of them are brainwashed by
the cult.

Besides, after I saw your posts, I decided to stay.
Get used to it or leave :-)

G-A