rosie readandpuke

[Angel Martin]

Had to do it.

[Shawster]

maybe you should start listening to those unemployed bicycle riders after
all.


"Angel Martin" <mikedawn@flash.net> wrote in message
news:100720031949436199%mikedawn@flash.net...
> Had to do it.
>

[Jonathan Bratt]

In message <100720031949436199%mikedawn@flash.net>, Angel Martin
<mikedawn@flash.net> writes
>Had to do it.

Why?
--
Jonathan Bratt

[Dan McGown]

> Had to do it.

How about this: Take a mulligan. Have a do-over. Forget that you posted
that and start over. Try again and we'll try to see what you have to
contribute or what you came here needing or both.

We're pretty much all here because we are people who need a fresh start or
even have needed a bunch of fresh starts, so we all know what it's like to
screw up and need a clean slate.

Try again.

[rosie readandpost]

"Angel Martin" <mikedawn@flash.net> wrote in message news:100720031949436199%mikedawn@flash.net...
> Had to do it.


feel better?
:)

[rosie readandpost]

> Why do you think commenting on Rosie's posts would haunt someone? Can we
> not say the emperor(ess) has no clothes?
>
>


WHAT????????????????????????????????
can you see through my screen????????????????????????/

love ya moon!

[Moonraker]

Not to be in an argument with you, Stuart.....don't want to go there.

Why do you think commenting on Rosie's posts would haunt someone? Can we
not say the emperor(ess) has no clothes?



"stuart" <nospam@outerspace.com> wrote in message
news:XiAPa.54362$ZS3.6014911@news2.telusplanet.net ...
>
> "Angel Martin" <mikedawn@flash.net> wrote in message
> news:100720031949436199%mikedawn@flash.net...
> > Had to do it.
>
> Do what? Let everyone know you don't especially care for Rosie's posts?
> That's OK.
> I wouldn't give it "legs" tho' because then it haunts *you*.
> Posting, gives it legs, doesn't it? Why not tell Rosie privately how you
> feel?
>
>

[Moonraker]

"rosie readandpost" <readandpost@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:VHAPa.201599$Xl.3359868@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
>
> > Why do you think commenting on Rosie's posts would haunt someone? Can
we
> > not say the emperor(ess) has no clothes?
> >
> >
>
>
> WHAT????????????????????????????????
> can you see through my screen????????????????????????/
>
> love ya moon!
>
>
Ummmmm huh. Had to get two of 'em side by side to get the whole effect,
tho.

[Moonraker]

Apple? Hell...I'm still running a TRS-80. You look a bit green around the
gills with this old mono monitor.
"rosie readandpost" <readandpost@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:XABPa.201920$Xl.3362149@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> > > WHAT????????????????????????????????
> > > can you see through my screen????????????????????????/
> > >
> > > love ya moon!
> > >
> > >
> > Ummmmm huh. Had to get two of 'em side by side to get the whole
effect,
> > tho.
> >
> >
> >
>
> why not get a job, so you can afford something bigger than a five inch
screen.
> i'm actually surprised you can pick up newgroups on your old APPLE.
> ...........................
>
>

[rosie readandpost]

:)

--
read and post daily, it works!
rosie

ever wonder if we would care more about each other if we realized how much we have in common?
..............................R. Nagy




"Moonraker" <fuggadaboutit@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:OzBPa.1215$_j.1140@fe05.atl2.webusenet.com...
> Apple? Hell...I'm still running a TRS-80. You look a bit green around the
> gills with this old mono monitor.
> "rosie readandpost" <readandpost@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:XABPa.201920$Xl.3362149@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> > > > WHAT????????????????????????????????
> > > > can you see through my screen????????????????????????/
> > > >
> > > > love ya moon!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Ummmmm huh. Had to get two of 'em side by side to get the whole
> effect,
> > > tho.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > why not get a job, so you can afford something bigger than a five inch
> screen.
> > i'm actually surprised you can pick up newgroups on your old APPLE.
> > ...........................
> >
> >
>
>
>

[stuart]

"Shawster" <shawster@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:DzoPa.4465$k85.352756@twister.tampabay.rr.com ...
> maybe you should start listening to those unemployed bicycle riders after
> all.
>
>
> "Angel Martin" <mikedawn@flash.net> wrote in message
> news:100720031949436199%mikedawn@flash.net...
> > Had to do it.
> >
>
>

[catsruleok]

"Angel Martin" <mikedawn@flash.net> wrote in message news:100720031949436199%mikedawn@flash.net...
> Had to do it.

I hope it made you feel better.

Personally, I think Rosie's posts are an asset to this NG. Everyone who reads them finds in them
something from which they can benefit

Even you :^))

JB

[cariad]

In article <DzoPa.4465$k85.352756@twister.tampabay.rr.com>,
shawster@tampabay.rr.com says...
> maybe you should start listening to those unemployed bicycle riders after
> all.

<snip>

what is wrong with unemployed cyclists?
(sorry, i don't get it)

[cariad]

In article <52TPa.10072$k85.541888@twister.tampabay.rr.com>,
shawster@tampabay.rr.com says...
>
> "cariad ntlworld.com>" <pink@<preconceptions> wrote in message
> news:MPG.197a00505d89ab1f989891@text.news.ntlworld .com...
> > In article <DzoPa.4465$k85.352756@twister.tampabay.rr.com>,
> > shawster@tampabay.rr.com says...
> > > maybe you should start listening to those unemployed bicycle riders
> after
> > > all.
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > what is wrong with unemployed cyclists?
> > (sorry, i don't get it)
>
> nothing is wrong with unemployed cyclists. you do get it.
>
> It was in response to an earlier thread where agent had proclaimed himself
> and his program superior to those that did not seek monetary gains. And
> then he showed his ass with this thread start.
>
> HTH


phew, glad i wasn't just being dense then <g. thanks for clarifying that
hon :0)

adrica