"Rob D." <>
> May 21 2007, 7:17 pm LOL I'm not at all surprised to get continued
> retorts such as that from a papist. Obviously your religion makes it
> incredibly difficult for you to grasp objective reality, so I'll
> deign
> to explain further.
>
> May 25, 2007, 2:14 PM: Observations, and questions related to those
> observations, are not, by themselves a plan of action to live by,
> rather, they may assist in deciding an aspiration, and/or plan of
> action, Although I don't quite take your glib retort as proof
> pertaining to my question, I'm not at all surprised that

I suppose that means we won't be able to surprise Bob =
even with a surpise.

Ahh well that doesn't surprise me at all hahahaha

at all

at all

On May 25, 7:03 pm, "Tommy" <tommyleepreech...@geeup.com> wrote:

>
> Ahh well that doesn't surprise me at all hahahaha
>
> at all
>
> at all

Do you suppose that B.M. is really a netbot, and this was just one of
his preprogrammed stock phrases?

I, for one, wouldn't be at all surprised.

;-)

Rob D.

Rob D. wrote:
> On May 25, 7:03 pm, "Tommy" <tommyleepreech...@geeup.com> wrote:
>
>> Ahh well that doesn't surprise me at all hahahaha
>>
>> at all
>>
>> at all
>
> Do you suppose that B.M. is really a netbot, and this was just one of
> his preprogrammed stock phrases?
>
> I, for one, wouldn't be at all surprised.
>
> ;-)
>

Jeez, if irrelevent stunts like that are the best you can come up with
to justify your egotistical misrepresentation of a simple program of
recovery, it's a pleasant surprise indeed.

--
Humbled Bob

F.H. wrote:
> Rob D. wrote:
>> On May 25, 2:14 pm, Robert McGregor <r...@sixtythree.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Observations, and questions related to those observations, are
>>> not, by themselves a plan of action to live by, rather, they may
>>> assist in deciding an aspiration, and/or plan of action,
>>> Although I don't quite take your glib retort as proof pertaining
>>> to my question, I'm not at all surprised that reality has
>>> apparently eluded a priest/sponsor such as yourself.
>>>
>>
>> I doubt you'd be "at all surprised" if Jesus Himself, still
>> bleeding from His wounds, jumped out of your birthday cake.
>>
>> Robert McGregor repeatedly wrote:
>>
>> December 9, 2000, 11:58 PM: I'm not at all surprised.
>>
>> Jan 6, 2001, 10:40 AM : Does not surprise me at all that Bill
>> Wilson tried to squirm his way out of a contradiction of his own
>> making.
>>
>> July 16, 2003, 5:46 PM: Given your professed dependence on drugs
>> precludes safer if not easier options, I'm not at all surprised you
>> don't get it, Tommy.
>>
>> July 27, 2004, 9:04 PM: Prone to mixed motives myself, I guess it's
>> no surprise I believe there are more motives here than posters.
>>
>> August 27, 2003, 9:04 PM : Jay, I'm not at all surprised you know
>> of no one. If you imagine that feeding an AA podium addiction for
>> 15+ years is proof, or even indicative of virtue, you are naive.
>>
>> Nov 18 2003, 1:12 am : Given the smarm you've pasted here, I'm not
>> at all surprised you didn't bother to ask, either.
>>
>> November 29, 2003, 11:48 PM: I'm not surprised you don't take
>> your own advice. With you "helping" someone, suicide could well be
>> their best option.
>>
>> Mar 8 2004, 7:56 pm : Following your ineptitude comprehending AA's
>> dogma, I'm not at all surprised you are also projecting your social
>> ineptitude here.
>>
>> May 2, 2005, 6:40 PM: Your top posted whinging about my netiquette
>> is no surprise at all.
>>
>> October 15, 2005, 5:20 PM: Yeah, right, although it's no surprise
>> that bit of reality would be way too much for your ilk to cope
>> with. Particularly since you recently sought out the press merely
>> to promote your "heroic" abstinence.
>>
>> November 18, 2005, 10:12 PM: Your telling us that *you* holler for
>> Jesus when you're *truly* hammered is no surprise then, at all.
>>
>> April 23, 2006, 3:07 AM: With that sort of "new soil" I'm not at
>> all surprised Bill rocketed from his "fourth dimension" to
>> "suicidal depression." ... "Pass It On" page 293
>>
>> July 31, 2006 12:24 AM: That's no surprise.
>>
>> September 22, 2006, 1:23 PM: No surprise a nascent treatment
>> industry didn't stay powerless with a concept as fearsome as that.
>>
>> May 5, 2007, 11:14 PM: Oh, I'm not at all surprised to get that
>> retort from a papist.
>>
>> May 21 2007, 7:17 pm LOL I'm not at all surprised to get continued
>> retorts such as that from a papist. Obviously your religion makes
>> it incredibly difficult for you to grasp objective reality, so
>> I'll deign to explain further.
>>
>> May 25, 2007, 2:14 PM: Observations, and questions related to those
>> observations, are not, by themselves a plan of action to live by,
>> rather, they may assist in deciding an aspiration, and/or plan of
>> action, Although I don't quite take your glib retort as proof
>> pertaining to my question, I'm not at all surprised that reality
>> has apparently eluded a priest/sponsor such as yourself.
>
> LMAO, the prosecution rests.


Prosecution???

Given a nodding acquaintance of Brer Frank actually paid out real money,
repeatedly, and then repeatedly yet again, merely to prove his foresight
would ensure he wasn't surprised, I just love the irony here.

Even more so when this second leg of the double was a *complete*
surprise; for me.

LMAO indeed!

--
Hindsight Bob

On May 25, 11:36 pm, Robert McGregor <r...@sixtythree.com> wrote:
>
> Jeez, if irrelevent stunts like that are the best you can come up with
> to justify your egotistical misrepresentation of a simple program of
> recovery, it's a pleasant surprise indeed.
>

That's good, Bob. I hope that's working out for you.

"Rob D." <fr.robert.dye@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180176571.774764.75490@p77g2000hsh.googlegro ups.com...
> On May 25, 11:36 pm, Robert McGregor <r...@sixtythree.com> wrote:
>>
>> Jeez, if irrelevent stunts like that are the best you can come up with
>> to justify your egotistical misrepresentation of a simple program of
>> recovery, it's a pleasant surprise indeed.
>>
>
> That's good, Bob. I hope that's working out for you.
>

Bob M. sounds like a legend......in his own mind, that is.
Hell, I was like that, too, back in my bad, old drinkin' days.

Robert McGregor wrote:
> F.H. wrote:
>> Rob D. wrote:
>>> On May 25, 2:14 pm, Robert McGregor <r...@sixtythree.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Observations, and questions related to those observations, are not,
>>>> by themselves a plan of action to live by, rather, they may
>>>> assist in deciding an aspiration, and/or plan of action,
>>>> Although I don't quite take your glib retort as proof pertaining
>>>> to my question, I'm not at all surprised that reality has
>>>> apparently eluded a priest/sponsor such as yourself.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I doubt you'd be "at all surprised" if Jesus Himself, still bleeding
>>> from His wounds, jumped out of your birthday cake.
>>>
>>> Robert McGregor repeatedly wrote:
>>>
>>> December 9, 2000, 11:58 PM: I'm not at all surprised.
>>>
>>> Jan 6, 2001, 10:40 AM : Does not surprise me at all that Bill Wilson
>>> tried to squirm his way out of a contradiction of his own making.
>>>
>>> July 16, 2003, 5:46 PM: Given your professed dependence on drugs
>>> precludes safer if not easier options, I'm not at all surprised you
>>> don't get it, Tommy.
>>>
>>> July 27, 2004, 9:04 PM: Prone to mixed motives myself, I guess it's
>>> no surprise I believe there are more motives here than posters.
>>>
>>> August 27, 2003, 9:04 PM : Jay, I'm not at all surprised you know of
>>> no one. If you imagine that feeding an AA podium addiction for 15+
>>> years is proof, or even indicative of virtue, you are naive.
>>>
>>> Nov 18 2003, 1:12 am : Given the smarm you've pasted here, I'm not
>>> at all surprised you didn't bother to ask, either.
>>>
>>> November 29, 2003, 11:48 PM: I'm not surprised you don't take your
>>> own advice. With you "helping" someone, suicide could well be
>>> their best option.
>>>
>>> Mar 8 2004, 7:56 pm : Following your ineptitude comprehending AA's
>>> dogma, I'm not at all surprised you are also projecting your social
>>> ineptitude here.
>>>
>>> May 2, 2005, 6:40 PM: Your top posted whinging about my netiquette
>>> is no surprise at all.
>>>
>>> October 15, 2005, 5:20 PM: Yeah, right, although it's no surprise
>>> that bit of reality would be way too much for your ilk to cope with.
>>> Particularly since you recently sought out the press merely to
>>> promote your "heroic" abstinence.
>>>
>>> November 18, 2005, 10:12 PM: Your telling us that *you* holler for
>>> Jesus when you're *truly* hammered is no surprise then, at all.
>>>
>>> April 23, 2006, 3:07 AM: With that sort of "new soil" I'm not at all
>>> surprised Bill rocketed from his "fourth dimension" to "suicidal
>>> depression." ... "Pass It On" page 293
>>>
>>> July 31, 2006 12:24 AM: That's no surprise.
>>>
>>> September 22, 2006, 1:23 PM: No surprise a nascent treatment industry
>>> didn't stay powerless with a concept as fearsome as that.
>>>
>>> May 5, 2007, 11:14 PM: Oh, I'm not at all surprised to get that
>>> retort from a papist.
>>>
>>> May 21 2007, 7:17 pm LOL I'm not at all surprised to get continued
>>> retorts such as that from a papist. Obviously your religion makes
>>> it incredibly difficult for you to grasp objective reality, so
>>> I'll deign to explain further.
>>>
>>> May 25, 2007, 2:14 PM: Observations, and questions related to those
>>> observations, are not, by themselves a plan of action to live by,
>>> rather, they may assist in deciding an aspiration, and/or plan of
>>> action, Although I don't quite take your glib retort as proof
>>> pertaining to my question, I'm not at all surprised that reality has
>>> apparently eluded a priest/sponsor such as yourself.
>>
>> LMAO, the prosecution rests.
>
>
> Prosecution???

Analogy. Reasearch, closing arguments.


> Given a nodding acquaintance of Brer Frank actually paid out real money,
> repeatedly, and then repeatedly yet again, merely to prove his foresight
> would ensure he wasn't surprised, I just love the irony here.

*This* irony brings new meaning to subjective.

> Even more so when this second leg of the double was a *complete*
> surprise; for me.

> LMAO indeed!

Cut back on the Mary Jane, Bob.

"Robert McGregor" >>
>
> Jeez, if irrelevent stunts like that are the best you can come up
> with to justify your egotistical misrepresentation of a simple
> program of recovery, it's a pleasant surprise indeed.

> Humbled Bob

Heh heh, would that humbling have anything to do with how pleasantly
surprised you might make some feel, if you didn't misrepresent
Rosiepippyoop so much

((((((((((((((((((Bob))))))))))))

Cheers
Tommy