> >In message <i4ydnape341lgYGiXTWJiA@comcast.com>, MikeTheBike9
> ><mikethebike@home.com> writes
> >>Am I at a predominantly AA area? Mike.
> >>
> >>
> >Happily no.
>
> Happily? Did you ever actually try AA, or is this more of the
> "contempt prior to investigation"?
>
> --
> Blue Moon

i interpreted this quite differently than you BM.

happily, this newsgroup is NOT a predominant AA area, because there are a few in here, who truly aren't "the best page
of the BB, i have ever read"..................
ATTRACTION, NOT PROMOTION, remember?

On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 12:17:08 +0100, Jonathan Bratt
<jonnybratt@aol.com> wrote:

>I said 'happily' since it mean that both AA And other things can be
>discussed rather than it being restricted to one method or organisation.

Ah ok. With that, I would agree. If AA meetings were my sole source
of information, my head would be more screwed up than it already is

--
Blue Moon

On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:23:42 GMT, "rosie readandpost"
<readandpost@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote:

>
>
>> >In message <i4ydnape341lgYGiXTWJiA@comcast.com>, MikeTheBike9
>> ><mikethebike@home.com> writes
>> >>Am I at a predominantly AA area? Mike.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >Happily no.
>>
>> Happily? Did you ever actually try AA, or is this more of the
>> "contempt prior to investigation"?
>>
>> --
>> Blue Moon
>
>i interpreted this quite differently than you BM.
>
>happily, this newsgroup is NOT a predominant AA area, because there are a few in here, who truly aren't "the best page
>of the BB, i have ever read"..................

From the follow-up, seems like your interpretation was a little
off-beam also

--
Blue Moon