"rosie readandpost" <readandpost@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:zUGUa.53589$6a3.967284@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
>
> > I see. Disagreeing with Rosie is "causing crap". GSO apparently has NO
> > interpretation, since the pamphlet is 30 years old and out of print. I
have
> > the GSO order form for pamphlets right in front of me. T'aint there.
Can't
> > get it.
> >
> >
> >
>
> you just aren't keeping up, are you?
> your just looking for a fight..................................and instead
you are looking like an idiot!
>
> it IS in print.....................check the GSO literature ordering form,
something a little more current that the one
> you keep saying is right in front of you!
>
What part of me telling you it isn't on the list I have didn't you
comprehend? I have a 4 or 5 month old PI kit from GSO and that pamphlet is
NOT on my order forms.

On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 21:21:26 -0500, "rosie readandpost"
<readandpost@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote:

>your interpretation is not that of GSO!

My interpretation seems to quite accurately reflect that printed in
the pamphlet. So in what way is my interpretation NOT that of GSO?

--
Blue Moon

> What part of me telling you it isn't on the list I have didn't you
> comprehend? I have a 4 or 5 month old PI kit from GSO and that pamphlet is
> NOT on my order forms.
>
>
>
>

your PI kit was put together with dated material, would be my guess.
the pamphlet is INDEED still in print.
you would know that, if you were truly interested in facts, and not just arguing.

http://www.aa.org/default/en_about_a...d=25&pageid=24