![]() |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dual Diagnosis Literature, Articles, Chapters and Abstracts
"Dual Diagnosis Literature, Articles, Chapters and Abstracts"
http://users.erols.com/ksciacca/ Excerpts: "Dual diagnosis refers to the co-occurence of mental health disorders and substance abuse disorders (alcohol and/or drug dependence or abuse). Dual Diagnosis, and Dual/Multiple disorders profiles may include the following: 1. Severe/major mental illness and a substance disorder(s) 2. Substance disorder(s) and a personality disorder(s) 3. Substance disorder(s), personality disorder(s) and substance induced acute symptoms that may require psychiatric care, i.e., hallucinations, depression, and other symptoms resulting from substance abuse or withdrawal. 4. Substance abuse, mental illness, and organic syndromes in various combinations. Organic sydromes may be a result of substance abuse, or independent of substance abuse. 5. Persons are found across the mental health and substance abuse systems who have various combinations of these dual/multiple disorders. 6. They are also found outside of these systems of care, often among the homeless, and within the criminal justice system. 7. Acronyms that define various dual disorders: MICAA: Mentally Ill, Chemical Abusers, and Addicted. Denotes the severely mentally ill chemical abuser. (Sciacca, 1991) 8. MISA: Mentally Ill Substance Abuser. May denote various combinations of dual disorders with or without severe mental illness. 9. MIDAA*, This denotes the inclusion of Mental Illness, Drug Addiction and Alcoholism in various combinations as dual/multiple disorders. 10. CAMI: Chemical Abusing Mentally Ill. This denotes Chemical abuse or dependence as primary with personality disorders (but without severe mental illness). (Sciacca,1991). 11. CAMI, With substance induced psychotic episodes: Same as CAMI with induced acute symptoms. (Sciacca,1991) Reference: Sciacca, K. "An Integrated Treatment Approach for Severely Mentally Ill Individuals with Substance Disorders" New Directions for Mental Health Services, Jossey Bass Publ. Summer 1991,#50. "traditional addiction treatment emphasizes the concept of "hitting bottom" as a necessary prerequisite to sobriety (that is, patients must experience severe losses or deterioration in order to perceive that they need help for addiction). For MICAA patients, however, "hitting bottom" can mean decompensation into severe psychosis and regression in all areas of functioning. This is not recommended. Sciacca (1987b) has advocated that MICAA clients be maintained at a stable level, and that progress in substance abuse treatment should proceed from that level." http://users.erols.com/ksciacca/integ.htm |
| Sponsored Advertisements |
| BANNER CODE HERE |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Dual Diagnosis Literature, Articles, Chapters and Abstracts
http://users.erols.com/ksciacca/chaptfam.htm
"The Family and the Dually Diagnosed Patient" Excerpt: "A growing awareness of the problems and some solutions to the provision of treatment of persons who are dually diagnosed is under way. Much has been written about the problems of substance abuse among mentally ill patients. These patients have been characterized as systems misfits with poor outcome, more relapses, more acting out behavior, and more likelihood of being homeless (Minkoff and Drake,1991). Dually diagnosed patients experience interaction effects that compound their distress and disability (Evans and Sullivan 1991). These patients tend to respond to their distress by exhibiting highly disturbing acting-out behaviors (McCarrick, Manderschied, et.al. 1985) Despite these serious consequences, the family movement has not attained the degree of knowledge about addictive disorders as they have about mental illness. There is a need for education that demonstrates that addictive disorders are illnesses. Understanding mental illness as a disease that is not caused by families was necessary to successful advocacy for the mentally ill. The same advocacy must happen for those who are dually diagnosed, through a clear understanding of the addictive disorders. Families of the dually diagnosed continue to experience frustration resulting from a service delivery system that does not meet their needs, or the needs of their relatives. ISSUES THAT IMPEDE SERVICES FOR THE DUALLY DIAGNOSED AND FAMILIES. Both families and providers encounter difficulty in accessing comprehensive services for the dually diagnosed. The underlying issues are the same nationally. They include: 1. Divided bureaucracies across discrete disorders, mental illness, drug addiction and alcoholism and segregated admissions criteria, treatment programs, services, and reimbursement; 2. Providers are educated and trained to deliver services for singular disorders, and are not prepared to provide services for unfamiliar symptoms (Ridgely, Goldman,& Willenbring,1990); and, 3. Treatment approaches across these discrete disorders are different in method and philosophy and are in direct contrast and incompatible (Sciacca,1991). Traditional treatment methods for drug addiction and alcoholism are usually intense and confrontational. They are designed to break down the patient's denial or resistance of his or her addictive disorder. Admissions criteria to substance abuse programs usually require abstinence from all illicit substances. Potential patients are expected to be aware of the problems caused by substance abuse, and motivated to receive treatment. In some programs the use of medication unacceptable. This automatically excludes people who take prescribed medication for their symptoms of mental illness. In contrast, treatment methods used for serious mental illness are supportive, benign and non-threatening. They are designed to maintain the patient's defenses which are often fragile to begin with. These differences perpetuate the gaps in services and eliminate the dually diagnosed from existing services. The traditional substance abuse services will not accept patients who have a serious mental illness either because they do not meet the readiness criteria, or because they are not prepared to provide services for symptoms of mental illness. If accepted into a substance abuse program that is not modified, the dually diagnosed patient may experience difficulty when participating in an intense, confrontational program." http://users.erols.com/ksciacca/chaptfam.htm |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|