<MI5Victim@mi5.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050812494099@4ax.com...
> In article <DFGxnF.Cr8.0.bloor@torfree.net>
> bu765@torfree.net "Mike Corley" writes:
>
>>>> ##: There were also a few other things said at the trial
>>>> ##: relating to this which I won't repeat here; it was in the papers
>>>> ##: at the time anyway. This quote and others said by and about this
>>>> ##: witness were repeating things that had been said by and about
>>>> ##: me at around that time.
>
> When, where and by whom ? Let's have some details
> that can be checked.
>
> I'm not going to repeat them. They're hurtful to me because they
contained abuse that was
> directed against me by someone else at the time and which got picked up
and thrown again
> in the trial. It is a matter of record but I won't repeat it here.
>
>>>> PM: >Who's character is being assassinated? It isn't clear from the
post.
>>>> PM: >Are we talking about Grenville Janner? I thought he was a spook
>>>> PM: >himself? He's certainly able to hold his own on the issue you
cite.
>
>>>> ##: Mine, mainly. The reason for putting that episode at the top
>>>> ##: of the posting is that they tried to kill two birds with one
stone
>>>> ##: at the Beck trial - they simultaneously put words into the mouth
>>>> ##: of their invented "witness" to smear Janner, and repeated
exactly,
>>>> ##: word-for-word, stuff which had been said by and about me.
>
> Why would "they" wish to assassinate your character?
>
> Well, let's put it this way - just because this is the first time it's
happened in this way,
> from these people, on this scale, doesn't mean that it hasn't happened
before, on a lesser
> scale. At university there were people who quite overtly hated me and
would have wished
> something nasty to happen to me. Because of where I went making the
wrong sort of enemies
> is pretty deadly.
>
> "They" would wish to assassinate my character because it had all been
done before, and
> because they knew I would not be able to react in any other way than I'd
reacted previously.
>
>>>> ##: They invaded my home with their bugs, they repeated what I
>>>> ##: was saying in the privacy of my home, and they laughed that it
>>>> ##: was "so funny", that I was impotent and could not even
communicate
>>>> ##: what was going on. Who did this? Our friends on BBC television,
>>>> ##: our friends in ITN, last but not least our friends in Capital
>>>> ##: Radio in London and on Radio 1.
>
> Please give details of when, where and by whom these
> comments were made, so that they can be checked.
>
> This was four, five years ago... sorry, I don't remember. I can remember
individual incidents,
> words which were repeated by different people at different times in
different locations.
>
> Around the end of 1992 Private Eye rtan a front-cover with John and
Norma Major, with
> the title "Major's support lowest ever" and John saying to Norma "Come
back norma" on the
> front cover. What can you read in to that? Not a lot, seems like
standard fare for PE.
> The first time I saw it I was in the pub with some people from work. One
was expressing doubts
> to the other (let's call the first one Simon, shall we? and the second
one Phil?) about
> whether what was going on was right. Phil's answer was that if Private
Eye was doing it
> then it must be ok, "they're usually right".
>
> A few days later, again near work, there were some students laughing in
the street,
> "Were you COMING BACK later? But I thought you said you were COMING BACK
ha ha ha?"
> Play on words, you see. Not very nice, either. I had start medication
soon afterwards.
> Clever people, these chaps who think up PE titles. Just slightly lacking
in any
> sense of morality.
>
>>>> ##: How did they do this? I'll give you an example. About a year ago,
>>>> ##: I was listening to Chris Tarrant (Capital Radio DJ among other
>>>> ##: pursuits) on his radio morning show, when he said, talking about
>>>> ##: someone he didn't identify, "you know this bloke? he says we're
>>>> ##: trying to kill him. We should be done for attempted manslaughter"
>>>> ##: which mirrored something I had said a day or two before.
>>>> ##: Now that got broadcast to the whole of London - if any recordings
>>>> ##: are kept of the shows then it'll be there.
>
> What was the date of the broadcast ?
> Out of 2 million plus listeners, why should you be
> the only one that Tarrant was allegedly referring to ?
>
> Sometyime in spring 1994. I can't remember the date, I heard the
broadcast in the
> car - I was going into the office from London that day and just happened
to snap
> on the radio, and hey presto! Mr Tarrant gives us the benefit of his
excellent
> understanding.
>
>
>>>> ##: That's exactly what we did. We went to a competent, professional
>>>> ##: detective agency in London, paid them over 400 quid to debug our
house.
>>>> ##: They found nothing.
>
> What was the name of the detective agency and their
> address ?
>
> I don't see why I should tell you that, but they're in Yellow Pages;
they're
> a well-established outfit.
>
>>>> PM: >What? Spend a quarter mil. a year to amuse themselves? And why
not
>>>> PM: >change every now and again? Why keep watching you? (Unless you
_are_
>>>> PM: >doing something, and I don't think you are, though you may have
some
>>>> PM: >deep, dark secret in your past.)
>>>>
>>>> ##: See the above.
>
> Is there a deep dark secret in your past ?
>
> Apart from "it's all happened before in a different way", no.
>
>>>> ##: In a couple of cases people have even known my name - when I was
in
>>>> ##: London over Easter somebody (no idea who they were, just some
bloke with
>
>>>> ##: his girlfriend) called me by name - quite clearly, and my name
is
>>>> ##: distinctive.
>
> Is your name truly Mike Corley, or are you using it as
> an alias ?
>
> It's an alias. I'm not English by ethnic origin. If someone manages to
pronounce
> my name as well as that guy did then they must have been really trying.
>
>>>> ##: There's a little story behind this. First of all, in 1992 I
worked
>>>> ##: for a company where the people made clear they knew what was
going on,
>>>> ##: first of all directly (the very first evening I was there I went
out to
>>>> ##: the pub with them and the Technical Director said to another guy,
>>>> ##: "is this the bloke who's been on TV?" "yeah, I think so")
>
> Have you appeared, or been reported by name on TV ?
> When, where and by whom ?
>
> No. Never. Not directly.
>
>>>> ##: Also, in summer 1992 I went on a trip abroad to Europe by coach,
>
> What was the name of the coach company and your date
> of departure ?
>
> It was a national express coach. At dover we boarded a ferry for Holland
somewhere.
> The company that organized the trip went out of business some time ago,
so they won't
> have records of passengers - so we can't get any corroboration from
anyone else
> that way. We tried all that last summer, ran into a brick wall.
>
> The other thing is in summer 1992 I was visibly ill, so other people in
the
> party might remember that more than anyone getting at me on the coach
trip.
>
>>>> ##: >>Yes, this gets me. I think the answer is that I was set up by
>>>> ##: >>someone. I was very aware when this started back in 1990 that I
>>>> ##: >>was being painted as a "threat" to which people had to "react"
>
> Why were you being painted as a "threat"; is this related
> to a "deep,dark, secret" ?
>
> Aaaarrrrgh. I think I should make clear that that's their created
justification
> rather than the real reason. They started harassing first and then came
up with the
> reasons for it.
>
>>>>
>>>> ##: I think I know who set me up.
>
> Who ?
>
> Someone who knew me some time ago. Someone who would have been able to
talk this
> little campaign into existence.
>
>>>> ##: The bloke can't even control his own mind without medicine.
>
> Is this true ? What is the medication and dosage ?
>
> Yes, I'm afraid so. Sulpiride, 200mg a day. It's designed to stop people
> coming up with the sort of ideas you've heard here for the last few
weeks.
> Give him a higher dose!!
>
> In the long term it causes tardive dyskinesia, tardive dementia and
general
> nasty stuff to your brain. So it's three years of sulpiride talking to
you here.
>
>>--
>>john heelan
>
> 1803

off topic

tpatrickb
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------