Robert McGregor wrote:
> F.H. wrote:
>> Rob D. wrote:
>>> On May 25, 2:14 pm, Robert McGregor <r...@sixtythree.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Observations, and questions related to those observations, are not,
>>>> by themselves a plan of action to live by, rather, they may
>>>> assist in deciding an aspiration, and/or plan of action,
>>>> Although I don't quite take your glib retort as proof pertaining
>>>> to my question, I'm not at all surprised that reality has
>>>> apparently eluded a priest/sponsor such as yourself.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I doubt you'd be "at all surprised" if Jesus Himself, still bleeding
>>> from His wounds, jumped out of your birthday cake.
>>>
>>> Robert McGregor repeatedly wrote:
>>>
>>> December 9, 2000, 11:58 PM: I'm not at all surprised.
>>>
>>> Jan 6, 2001, 10:40 AM : Does not surprise me at all that Bill Wilson
>>> tried to squirm his way out of a contradiction of his own making.
>>>
>>> July 16, 2003, 5:46 PM: Given your professed dependence on drugs
>>> precludes safer if not easier options, I'm not at all surprised you
>>> don't get it, Tommy.
>>>
>>> July 27, 2004, 9:04 PM: Prone to mixed motives myself, I guess it's
>>> no surprise I believe there are more motives here than posters.
>>>
>>> August 27, 2003, 9:04 PM : Jay, I'm not at all surprised you know of
>>> no one. If you imagine that feeding an AA podium addiction for 15+
>>> years is proof, or even indicative of virtue, you are naive.
>>>
>>> Nov 18 2003, 1:12 am : Given the smarm you've pasted here, I'm not
>>> at all surprised you didn't bother to ask, either.
>>>
>>> November 29, 2003, 11:48 PM: I'm not surprised you don't take your
>>> own advice. With you "helping" someone, suicide could well be
>>> their best option.
>>>
>>> Mar 8 2004, 7:56 pm : Following your ineptitude comprehending AA's
>>> dogma, I'm not at all surprised you are also projecting your social
>>> ineptitude here.
>>>
>>> May 2, 2005, 6:40 PM: Your top posted whinging about my netiquette
>>> is no surprise at all.
>>>
>>> October 15, 2005, 5:20 PM: Yeah, right, although it's no surprise
>>> that bit of reality would be way too much for your ilk to cope with.
>>> Particularly since you recently sought out the press merely to
>>> promote your "heroic" abstinence.
>>>
>>> November 18, 2005, 10:12 PM: Your telling us that *you* holler for
>>> Jesus when you're *truly* hammered is no surprise then, at all.
>>>
>>> April 23, 2006, 3:07 AM: With that sort of "new soil" I'm not at all
>>> surprised Bill rocketed from his "fourth dimension" to "suicidal
>>> depression." ... "Pass It On" page 293
>>>
>>> July 31, 2006 12:24 AM: That's no surprise.
>>>
>>> September 22, 2006, 1:23 PM: No surprise a nascent treatment industry
>>> didn't stay powerless with a concept as fearsome as that.
>>>
>>> May 5, 2007, 11:14 PM: Oh, I'm not at all surprised to get that
>>> retort from a papist.
>>>
>>> May 21 2007, 7:17 pm LOL I'm not at all surprised to get continued
>>> retorts such as that from a papist. Obviously your religion makes
>>> it incredibly difficult for you to grasp objective reality, so
>>> I'll deign to explain further.
>>>
>>> May 25, 2007, 2:14 PM: Observations, and questions related to those
>>> observations, are not, by themselves a plan of action to live by,
>>> rather, they may assist in deciding an aspiration, and/or plan of
>>> action, Although I don't quite take your glib retort as proof
>>> pertaining to my question, I'm not at all surprised that reality has
>>> apparently eluded a priest/sponsor such as yourself.
>>
>> LMAO, the prosecution rests.
>
>
> Prosecution???

Analogy. Reasearch, closing arguments.


> Given a nodding acquaintance of Brer Frank actually paid out real money,
> repeatedly, and then repeatedly yet again, merely to prove his foresight
> would ensure he wasn't surprised, I just love the irony here.

*This* irony brings new meaning to subjective.

> Even more so when this second leg of the double was a *complete*
> surprise; for me.

> LMAO indeed!

Cut back on the Mary Jane, Bob.