Robert McGregor wrote:
> On Tue, 08 May 2007 20:01:04 -0700, Ken wrote:
>
>> Robert McGregor wrote:
>>> On Mon, 07 May 2007 10:24:01 -0700, Ken wrote:
>>>
>>>> Robert McGregor wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 06 May 2007 22:43:32 -0700, Ken wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> To get a bit of insight as to what AA is today, it might help to see
>>>>>> where AA came from. There is a brief and very kind-and-gentle chapter
>>>>>> on the history of AA at:
>>>>> LOL Bro Ken would never let facts mar the composition of a kind-and-gentle
>>>>> fable.
>>>>>
>>>> Robert,
>>>>
>>>> Would you care to "share" with us where the chapter on history (
>>>> http://www.morerevealed.com/library/mr/newmr_5.jsp ) is incorrect? Most
>>>> certainly, sticking to Oxford Group and AA historical sources, it was
>>>> kind and gentle. If I had gone outside those two sources (e.g. like
>>>> Orange Papers) or had pointed out more of the obvious, it would not have
>>>> been so kind and gentle.
>>>
>>> Ken, I'll gladly leave the pleasure of debating the integrity of your
>>> selective "research" to the hordes of new onlookers as I'm far too
>>> humble to monopolise *all* the podium here. Besides, our dual on this
>>> topic is already archived on google, more than once.
>>>
>> Robert,
>>
>> You do have a point saying selective research, although I'm not sure
>> what you use the quotes for. I was very selective and for the most part
>> only looked at AA an Oxford Group materials for the history chapter.
>>
>>
>
> Ken, as has been discussed almost to infinity, your research was selective
> in that you ignored documentation that exposed your mythology, while
> selecting documentation that suited your purpose.
>
> Bye
>

Robert,

Then I'm sure you will have no trouble pointing out something written in
the 1930s that is inconsistent with what I wrote about the founding of AA.

Put me to shame.

LOL!

Ken Ragge
http://www.morerevealed.com/library/