stuart wrote:

> Ken Ragge <ken@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:jpudnfV0av7_JTDfRVn-gg@comcast.com...
>
>>NutSoFast@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>>On 13-Jun-2005, Ken Ragge <ken@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Actually, that is exactly what recovery is about. It is setting
>>>>yourself up as wise guru surrounded by fawning followers.
>>>>
>>>>In AA, in many ways, the self doesn't exist, "God relieve me of the
>>>>bondage of self." When one is a borg, an attack on the collective is
>>>>seen as an attack by all the assimilated entities.
>>>
>>>
>>>Anyone who quotes Star Trek scenarios is worth emulating...
>>>So lead on Ken. I think I'm gonna follow you around
>>>for awhile! <b (vapid) n>
>>>
>>NutSoFast,
>>
>>I'm really delighted to see a grouper respond so cogently when
>>confronted with criticism of the group.
>>
>>Not only do you focus your attention on an analogy, I'll bet you can
>>find spelling and gramatical errors.
>
>
>
> That's the strange part, Ken. Of all of the intial responders to the
> original post who agreed wholeheartedly with you, not one of them had ANY
> spelling or grammatical errors. In fact, the literary style was highly
> similar, ie very professional, like the author of a book or something.
> Ever watch those infomercials on TV, where the "customer" steps in to
> endorse the product. Kinda looked like that Ken. You might be able to pull
> that stunt in front of many XA members, but not all of us came from skid row
> or prison with a sixth grade education.

I appreciate your attempt at flattery, but according to the
professionals including the last editor of "More Revealed," I have lousy
grammer. Even so . . .

Have you never heard, "No one is too stupid to get the program but many
are too smart?" Have you considered the possibility that some of the
ones who were too smart to "get it" were the ones responding?

In any case, I'm glad it is not my job to keep Steppers honest, to keep
them from endlessly repeating inane accustions.

Ken Ragge
http://www.morerevealed.com