In article <iQdZa.3085$Ih1.1294989@newssrv26.news.prodigy.com >, Markus
<markusx14u@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> "catsruleok" <catsruleok@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
> news:bh3chr$g08$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
>
> > I have read many posts that rubbish AA, some from people who found it
> didn't work for them and
> > others from those with no history of involvement with AA.
>
> Posts that rubbish AA? I think if you read a little more carefully you will
> see that most folks whom have spoken critically of AA, such as myself,
> simply point out the lies that AA and it's minions will pass off as fact.
> So in that regard, AA rubbishes itself. If you wish to be part of such an
> organization then by all means, go for it.
>
> Let me continue....
>
> I know personally a gal who believes that the "purification" program of
> narconon is ... [snip] ... I ask: "What is wrong with pointing
> out the truth?"

The truth pointed out here, is that Narcanon isn't AA.

> So you see, it isn't just about claiming one program is better than another
> or something did or did not work. It is also about pointing out the rubbish...

The rubbish is that you continue to attempt to "smear" AA by citing
entirely other things.